{"id":46887,"date":"2016-11-27T00:01:29","date_gmt":"2016-11-27T00:01:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/?p=46887"},"modified":"2016-11-26T06:55:03","modified_gmt":"2016-11-26T06:55:03","slug":"bubble-klagen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/bubble-klagen\/","title":{"rendered":"bubble, klagen"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>The power of Facebook is that you control what you see by who you choose to connect with.<\/em> <small>\u2013 Mark Zuckerberg in reply op eigen post na het verwijt dat Facebook de Amerikaanse verkiezingen be\u00efnvloed heeft<\/small><\/p>\n<p><!--- I want to share some thoughts on Facebook and the election. Our goal is to give every person a voice. We believe deeply in people. Assuming that people understand what is important in their lives and that they can express those views has driven not only our community, but democracy overall. Sometimes when people use their voice though, they say things that seem wrong and they support people you disagree with.\nAfter the election, many people are asking whether fake news contributed to the result, and what our responsibility is to prevent fake news from spreading. These are very important questions and I care deeply about getting them right. I want to do my best to explain what we know here.\nOf all the content on Facebook, more than 99% of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes. The hoaxes that do exist are not limited to one partisan view, or even to politics. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.\nThat said, we don't want any hoaxes on Facebook. Our goal is to show people the content they will find most meaningful, and people want accurate news. We have already launched work enabling our community to flag hoaxes and fake news, and there is more we can do here. We have made progress, and we will continue to work on this to improve further.\nThis is an area where I believe we must proceed very carefully though. Identifying the \"truth\" is complicated. While some hoaxes can be completely debunked, a greater amount of content, including from mainstream sources, often gets the basic idea right but some details wrong or omitted. An even greater volume of stories express an opinion that many will disagree with and flag as incorrect even when factual. I am confident we can find ways for our community to tell us what content is most meaningful, but I believe we must be extremely cautious about becoming arbiters of truth ourselves.\nAs we continue our research, we are committed to always updating you on how News Feed evolves. We hope to have more to share soon, although this work often takes longer than we'd like in order to confirm changes we make won't introduce unintended side effects or bias into the system. If you're interested in following our updates, I encourage you to follow our News Feed FYI here: http:\/\/bit.ly\/2frNWo2.\nOverall, I am proud of our role giving people a voice in this election. We helped more than 2 million people register to vote, and based on our estimates we got a similar number of people to vote who might have stayed home otherwise. We helped millions of people connect with candidates so they could hear from them directly and be better informed. Most importantly, we gave tens of millions of people tools to share billions of posts and reactions about this election. A lot of that dialog may not have happened without Facebook.\nThis has been a historic election and it has been very painful for many people. Still, I think it's important to try to understand the perspective of people on the other side. In my experience, people are good, and even if you may not feel that way today, believing in people leads to better results over the long term. ---><\/p>\n<p><!--- IDFA DocLab INTERACTIVE CONFERENCE 2016 ---><\/p>\n<p><!--- Ze zit bij een conferentie en appt een opmerking Kahane Cooperman over de verkiezingen in de Verenigde Staten. Cooperman geloofde de polls, zich niet realiserend hoezeer ze in een bubble leeft. Ze kent niemand die voor Trump stemde, ze heeft niemand hoeven ontvrienden op Facebook. \n\nIk snap het bericht niet. Verwondert het haar dat Cooperman zo'n enge vriendenkring heeft of dat ze iemand ontvriendt als diegene een Trump-aanhanger blijkt? Lekker in je bubble zitten en niet van plan zijn die te laten doorprikken door anderen...\n\n'Ja, dat laatste. Klagen dat je in een bubble zit en die in stand houden door mensen met een andere mening uit je feed te gooien. Kennelijk willen we in die bubble zitten.' ---><\/p>\n<p><!--- [10:42, 20-11-2016] Opmerking van een regisseur over de verkiezingen: ik geloofde de polls en realiseerde me niet hoe ik leef in een bubble. Ik ken niemand die voor trump stemt, ik heb niemand hoeven ontfrienden op facebook                        \n[10:42, 20-11-2016]\u00a0wikipedia subsidie argument                        \n[10:43, 20-11-2016]\u00a0(Met name de opmerking over ontvrienden vind ik opvallend als je je net realiseert dat je in een bubble leeft) \n[13:33, 20-11-2016] Ja, beide. Klagen dat je in een bubble blijkt te zitten maar dat ook in stand houden door mensen met een andere mening uit je feed te gooien                        \n[13:34, 20-11-2016]\u00a0Ik doe het ook, maar het is veelzeggend. Kennlijk willen we ook in een bubble zitten                        \n[13:36, 20-11-2016]\u00a0Ook gehoord: http:\/\/www.faception.com---><\/p>\n<p><!--- Kahane Cooperman \u2013 https:\/\/mobile.twitter.com\/KCornCoop\n@KCornCoop\nCurrently: Dir\/Prod of doc film @JoesViolin. Recently: EP of The New Yorker Presents. Before that: Co-EP of Daily Show w\/Jon Stewart.\nManhattan, NY\n132 Following157 Followers ---><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The power of Facebook is that you control what you see by who you choose to connect with. \u2013 Mark Zuckerberg in reply op eigen post na het verwijt dat Facebook de Amerikaanse verkiezingen be\u00efnvloed heeft<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2007,974],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46887"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46887"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46887\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47048,"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46887\/revisions\/47048"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.imhd.nl\/log\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}